Our Land Is Our
Responsibility
We, the residents of the area publicized as the
"Little Darby National Wildlife Refuge," in the counties of Madison and Union, want our voices heard! We, who live and
work in this farming community, believe the impact to area businesses
would jeopardize their very existence. The Madison County
Auditor's Office projects the affected region generates $300 per acre,
which "turns over" 6-7 times (in buying power) before leaving
the community. This translates into a potential deficit of $90
million dollars to our area businesses.
An article in the Columbus
Dispatch, dated May 9, 1999, states, in part, "Ohio has only one
small (Federal) wildlife refuge, on Lake Erie." In fact, from
the website of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, referencing the 1999 Land Acquisition Budget Request, there are already over 8,000 acres
in Ohio wildlife refuges. There are also many wildlife areas in
Ohio, including the Big Island Wildlife Area, just west of Marion, Ohio,
in Marion County, boasting 5,032 acres of bird-watchability, and only a
45-minute drive from downtown Columbus. There are also the
Killdeer Plains Wildlife Area, at 8,620 acres; and Wyandot Wildlife
Area, 328 acres, both of which are slightly over an hour's drive from
Franklin County.
In the immediate area, there are
also 11 Metroparks, containing over 16,000 acres that are readily available for public use (i.e., recreation, bird-watching, hiking,
etc.). The same article states: "...we pay a large
amount of money to Washington (D.C.). We're not getting our fair
share of the Interior Department budget." A Wildlife Refuge
is not a guarantee of receiving our fair share of that budget: in
1998, the Ottawa National Wildlife Refuge received only $48,458 of the
$73,253 that should have been paid "in lieu of taxes," as
posted on USFWS's website.
United States Representative Ralph S. Regula,
in a February 14, 1999, article in the Columbus Dispatch, asserts:
"It is simply irresponsible to take on new land responsibilities,
and give grants to cities, States and private institutions, when we
cannot afford to adequately take care of our primary Federal responsibilities - the public lands."
The State Forest Department manages and
protects 7.1 million acres of forestland in Ohio, for the benefit of all
Ohio citizens. 181,000 acres of State-owned forestland are
available for multiple benefits, including wildlife, recreation, timber
products, and soil and water protection. In addition, there are 72
State Parks in Ohio where the public can interact with nature at its
leisure. With this great abundance of parks and wildlife areas,
all supported by our tax dollars, is there really a need for more public
land?
Actual area land auctions show that a 500-acre
farm is worth $1.5 million dollars. To this initial cost, add a
reasonably priced home at a cost of $85,000, and minimal equipment at
approximately $641,000, and the combined start-up cost totals $2.226
MILLION DOLLARS. After committing to an investment of such
magnitude, why would our astute, agriculturally- and family-minded
farmers want to sell? In the case of the proposed Darby Prairie
National Wildlife Refuge, most of the 53,692 acres (the current acreage
that the USFWS has publicly stated in mid-June, 1999, up from the
original "50,000 acres or less" that was announced) is land
that has been acquired by our farmers over many generations. This
"ownership endurance" enables us to continue our
conservation-accredited farming skills, thus growing with our investments. At an average of 4.5 persons per home, this equates
to the possible residential displacement of over 7,500 people from the
Study Area alone, with a loss of approximately 4,000 taxpayers to the
community.
It has been suggested that there are many
"willing sellers" in the four-county area that is targeted for
a Refuge. A comprehensive study done within the proposed Study
Area shows that over 98.5% of the residents are opposed to the Refuge,
and have signed letters of opposition to that intention, and that number
is still growing!
Bo W. Thott, of Cutler, Maine, compiled a study
of "Willing Sellers" in various parts of the country in conjunction with the USFWS. The study states: "Fifty
percent of those responding, from a mailing list of 498, to which not
all responded, were coerced in some way to sell their land."
(Reference copy may be obtained by request from the Washington County
Alliance, W.C.A., HCR 69, Box 336, Cutler, ME 04626-9602, for $3 per
copy.)
An article written by John Fulton Lewis, dated
November 23,1998, entitled "Lots For Sale In A Last Great
Place," mentions the profit motive that seems to drive the
decisions made by The Nature Conservancy (TNC). Forget those
pledges of "intent to protect and preserve the area from urban
sprawl." TNC has publicly announced that it will sell
building lots on property that was originally purchased by TNC in two
counties in eastern Virginia, part of 45,000 acres of sparsely populated
land that should never be blighted by construction, either residential
or commercial. These building lots will sell for $40,000-200,000; this was land that was acquired under TNC's promise that it would
preserve habitats and species by buying the lands and waterways needed
for them to survive. David Hickman, an Eastern
Shore farmer and a member of the Virginia Farm Bureau's Board Of
Directors, has denounced TNC for its hypocrisy.
We have a proven track
record of providing Americans with a diversity of products in the global
marketplace, with a combination of wheat, corn, and soybeans; there
would be a loss of over 3 million bushels of grain from the Study Area!
With well over 50,000 acres lost to food production, how many non-farmers would be willing to relinquish their combined homes and
yards to replace the fertile soil that presently feeds so many, that would be permanently lost by the
introduction of a National Wildlife Refuge? At some point, we will
no longer have the abundance of high-quality, reasonably priced food
that we now take for granted at our supermarkets.
The growing of food to nourish our citizens is
certainly as much a consideration as re-establishing a tallgrass
prairie. Eating is not going to go out of style, and we are not
willingly going to yield our bountiful land to either developers or
Federal Agencies who say they are "protecting us" from
development. The argument that farmers can simply "purchase
farms somewhere else" lacks validity, because it presumes that such
profoundly fertile land is available at the same cost (if it is
available for purchase at all) as the land that is targeted, which is
some of the richest soil in the State of Ohio.
Those of us who have been entrusted with the
privilege of caring for the land, know well the proper care and
nurturing required to maintain, protect and preserve our farmlands, and
sustain a well-established wildlife habitat through conservation
management. With an eye to the future, and the experience of
almost two hundred years, we know that Our Land Is Our Responsibility!
Julie K. Smithson
213 Thorn Locust Lane
London, OH 43140
[email protected]
6476514 |