How to prepare for, and what to do at, a bill hearing

 

(Note: Celeste has done a phenomenal job on this!)

 

February 17, 2007

 

By Celeste Bishop [email protected] 

 

Shepherd's Heart Farm, Snohomish, Washington

360-568-8175

 

Contents:

 

1. Hearing Etiquette 101

 

2. Memorandum Template

 

3. Basic Template for Testifying

 

4. Appearance By Mail Certificate Example

 

5. Appearance By Mail Cover Example

 

6. Appearance By Mail Example 2

 

7. Sponsor Information

 

 

1. ===== Hearing Etiquette 101 =====

 

Hearing Etiquette 101

 

The No NAIS WA (No National Animal Identification System) Washington movement has been working very diligently this past year to bring awareness of the dangers of NAIS to the public and to our Legislators. We have built a foundation of honesty and integrity, which we would like to maintain during the legislative process in Olympia. We are requesting that you adhere to these guidelines. If you have concerns or comments regarding these please contact me at [email protected]. Our portion of the hearing will be approximately 15 minutes; we then can leave, quietly.

 

Please dress appropriately for Olympia. Men usually wear a suit, and women, skirts or a nice dress. If you dress more casually, it is all right.

 

Please be organized before entering the hearing room.

 

During the hearing please respectfully be silent and listen to the testimony. Talking during testimony is distracting to others who are listening.

 

When outside the O'Brien Building it is appropriate to also use a more subdued tone.

Cell phones and pagers must be turned off during the hearing.

 

Only three people will be allowed to testify. You may however bring a written testimony or Memorandum: For the Record. You should bring a copy for yourself, each Agriculture Committee Member, and the four Agricultural staffers.

 

You can sign in over on the left side, facing the Committee members you will find copies of the bill, digest, fiscal notes and a sign in sheet. Feel free to take a copy of these documents if you will use them.

 

When sign in over at the left. Please print your name, address, whether you favor or oppose our No NAIS HB 1151, and whether you would like to testify. Please put down that you do not wish to testify as those that are testifying have already been chosen. It is important though that you SIGN IN and put whether you are for or against the bill. This document will be passed around to each committee member to see who is for and against the bill.

 

When addressing the Chair you would say: Mr. Chairman. If the Chair were a woman, you would address the Chair as: Madam Chairwoman.

 

When addressing the Agricultural Committee you would say: Distinguished Committee Members or Committee.

 

No signs in the hearing room.

 

Children are welcome as long as they can adhere to these guidelines. This is a good educational experience in our legislative process.

 

Only comment verbally if you are called to testify.

 

 

2. ===== Memorandum Template =====

 

 

Your Name Goes Here

Your Address Goes Here, Your City, Your State And Zip

Via U.S. Postal Service First Class Mail (if applicable)

 

Example: Notice of Appearance and

Memorandum in Support of House Bill 1151

"Prohibiting the state from establishing or participating in an animal identification system"

 

Example: Public Hearing on February 21, 2007, before the

House Committee on Agriculture and Natural Resources

State of Washington, 60th Legislature, 2007 Regular Session

 

Example: STATEMENT OF FACTS

 

1. LET THE RECORD SHOW that Your name (hereinafter "Respondent"), hereby respectfully appears before the Committee.

 

2. LET THE RECORD SHOW that Respondent is domiciled in this state, of legal age, without legal disability, appears in his personal capacity, in Good Faith, and has no known conflict of interest with said proposed legislation.

 

3. LET THE RECORD SHOW that What is your interest in farming, NAIS or this bill?

 

Example: Respondent enjoys animal husbandry, farming and related activities. WHEREAS, Respondent has a vested interested in the enactment of this proposed legislation.

 

4. LET THE RECORD SHOW State facts you know to be true

 

Example: that the state currently performs under one or more contract(s), a.k.a. "Cooperative Agreement(s)", entered into and under the supervision of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, activities that include but are not limited to the implementation of the National Animal Identification System, or certain aspects thereof, in this state.

 

 

5. LET THE RECORD SHOW that: State more facts, itemized, one by one

 

 

Example: the state, pursuant to said contract(s), has already received certain funding from the U.S. Department of Agriculture that this proposed legislation seeks to discontinue. WHEREAS, the state has a conflict of interest, in light of the receipt of said funding or the promise thereof.

 

 

6. LET THE RECORD SHOW that the state, pursuant to said contract(s), has contracted with and offered compensation to one or more person(s) or organization(s) for the purpose of participating in and/or to carry out some of said activities that this proposed legislation seeks to discontinue. WHEREAS, any such person or organization has a conflict of interest in light of said contracts, or the promise thereof.

 

State your position on the bill: either favor or oppose

 

 

Example-MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF BILL

 

State any Constitutional or legal citations

 

 

7. LET THE RECORD SHOW that Example: Respondent holds that the state's establishment of or participation in any program or system purported to identify and/or register and/or track premises, animals, or activities in connection therewith, whether voluntary or mandatory, constitutes a trespass upon Respondent's FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT to property and impairs Respondent's right to contract. WHEREAS, Respondent supports enactment of said proposed legislation

 

Address each section briefly and either agree with the language and intent or make a suggestion. Address each section separately because you may agree with one section and not another section.

 

 

8. Example: In re: New Section, Sec. 1: LET THE RECORD SHOW that Respondent agrees with and fully supports the legislature's findings of fact, conclusions of fact, and legislative intent.

 

9. In re: New Section, Sec. 2: LET THE RECORD SHOW that Respondent agrees with and supports the legislature's definitions expressed by clauses (1) through (6). As regards clause (7), Respondent suggests to replace the term "verification" with "validation" throughout the entire bill.

 

If you make a suggestion or new language give your reasoning


Example: Reasoning: Because the legal definition of "verification" implies "supported by oath or affirmation", Respondent holds that the term "validation" would be a better way to express the bill's legislative intent.

 

10. In re: New Section, Sec. 3: LET THE RECORD SHOW that Respondent fully supports the legislative intent and the specific provisions of clauses (1) through (4).

 

11. In re: New Section, Sec. 4: LET THE RECORD SHOW that Respondent fully supports the legislative intent, namely the state's ability to respond to, control and eradicate a known disease in a specific specie of livestock.

 

12. In re: New Section, Sec. 5: LET THE RECORD SHOW that Respondent fully supports the legislative intent, namely the state's ability to maintain any of the pre-existing livestock identification, brand registration and inspection programs authorized under applicable state law.

 

13. In re: New Section, Sec. 6: LET THE RECORD SHOW that Respondent fully supports the legislative intent and specific provisions of clauses (1) through (4).

 

If you think a new section needs to be added insert the language and give your reasoning.

 

 

14. Example: In re: New Section, Sec. 6: LET THE RECORD SHOW that Respondent proposes to add the following provisions:

15. New Clause (5): Any person [domiciled in this state] registered in the National Animal Identification System by the director shall have the right to remain registered with or withdraw from said system consistent with other provisions of this section.
Reasoning: Unless this bill provides for a person's direct interaction with the National Animal Identification System, some persons would be permanently locked into the National Animal Identification System.

16. New Clause (6): Any person [domiciled in this state] wishing to register in the National Animal Identification System shall have the right to do so consistent with other provisions of this section.
Reasoning: Unless this bill provides for a person's direct interaction with the National Animal Identification System, some persons would be permanently shut out of the National Animal Identification System.

 

17. In re: New Section, Sec. 7: LET THE RECORD SHOW that Respondent fully supports the legislative intent and specific provisions of clauses (1) through (4).

 

18. In re: New Section, Sec. 7: LET THE RECORD SHOW that Respondent supports the legislature's intent and provisions expressed by clauses (1) through (3). Respondent proposes to expand clause (4) as follows (emphasis added):

19. Expanded Clause (4): Failure or refusal to participate in a premises registration or animal identification program, or the providing of services to persons who are not participants in a premises registration or animal identification program, shall not be a crime, nor an element of any crime, nor a civil infraction, nor evidence of any negligence or gross negligence on the part of any livestock owner or provider of goods or services.

Reasoning: With this expansion, the director would be prevented from levying civil penalties against non-participating persons.

 

20. In re: New Section, Sec. 7: LET THE RECORD SHOW that Respondent proposes to add the following provisions:

21. New Clause (5): Failure or refusal to participate in a premises registration or animal identification program shall not be construed as, nor shall it be used, as evidence of a person's legal incompetence, or legal disability, or indicate a lack of social responsibility as a citizen of this state.
Reasoning: Under this provision and absent an appropriate court order, the state would be barred from appointing a receiver over said person's affairs, property and/or livestock.

 

What do you want the committee to do with this bill?

 

Example: REQUEST FOR COMMITTEE ACTION

 

22. Respondent respectfully requests that the Committee reconcile the above suggestions with the bill's original provisions, and promptly forward the reconciled bill to the legislature for enactment into law.

 

State that you have stated the facts and have given the truth.

 

Example: DECLARATION

 

Respondent hereby declares that the forgoing is true and correct according to personal knowledge and belief.

 

 

     Date       Your Name(s)

 

Dated: February 15, 2007   /s/ Your Name Goes Here, Respondent

 

 

3. ===== Basic Template for Testifying =====

 

 

Basic Template for Testifying

 

Here is the format for a more casual Memorandum.

 

Include the following:

 

Your name

 

Your contact information

 

The proposed legislation being addressed

 

Your position on the Proposed Legislation

 

The facts that you have addressing the proposed legislation

 

Any legal citations that affect the proposed legislation

 

Any changes you might suggest, language, omissions, etc. If you make changes always give a reason why you are suggesting the proposed legislation be changed

 

Summary of your position on the proposed legislation

 

Sign and date if hard copy

 

Example

 

Name and Number of Proposed Legislation SB 5811

 

My Name and Contact Information:

Celeste Bishop

14301-127th Ave SE

Snohomish, WA

360-568-8175

[email protected]

NoNAIS.org

 

Your position on proposed legislation

 

FOR THE RECORD A MEMORANDUM OPPOSING SB 5811

 

Address the Chair and Committee- Mr. Chairman and distinguished committee members. I would appreciate my testimony be entered into the record.

 

Name and why the committee should listen to you or your connection (expertise) on the bill

 

My name is Celeste Bishop. I am a small non-commercial sustainable farmer in Snohomish County. I represent small farms, and property owners in Washington and nationally. I am engaged in an international value-added product business with another Snohomish County small farmer. In addition to farming I have been trained in emergency management at the local, county, state and federal levels. I have done contract work and exercised and donated time during disaster situations including 9-11, the Nisqually earthquakes, floods, and recent storms. My expertise is in emergency planning (including animal plans), communications and Incident Command.

 

Facts, legal Citations, Concerns

My concerns on proposed SB 5811 are the following:

  • The Legislature's reckless, arbitrary, and capricious overuse of the emergency clause by attaching it to non-emergency legislation has seriously impaired the citizens' right to referendum.
  • We the people feel find it odd that an emergency clause is inserted into a provision to extend the Cattle Advisory Board.
  • We the people of Washington have not been informed of any animal emergency and are left to wonder if the emergency is merely that the Cattle Advisory Board has sunset without any findings from their four projects, thus putting the Washington State Department of Agriculture (WSDA) in jeopardy of default from their receipt of federal funds for these projects.
  • If this distinguished committee knows of an animal emergency please inform us so that we might be proactive. We may be left to believe that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) may be promulgating a de facto mandatory implementation for cattle within interstate commerce.
  • The Cattle Advisory Board did not make a report to the legislature at the specified time and when they did finally make such a report it was not an official board. Hence, their recommendations are fraudulent due to untimely filing.
  • Washington has other viable animal breeds such as horses, hog, poultry, goat, sheep, llama, and alpaca, which have not been included into formulating any identification or disease program. Nor have small farms been included. This violates equal protection as set forth in the 14th Amendment.
  • Passage of this proposed legislation is depriving other segments of livestock industry representation.
  • It is interesting to note that there is no definition of 'emergency' within Chapter 16.
  • We have concern that due to the very nature of the Federal Cooperative Agreements signed in this matter that in fact the federal government has superseded state government in this case.

What you want the Committee to do

 

For these reasons, we oppose SB 5811 as it is written though we have no opposition, in itself, to the Cattle Advisory Board.

 

Thank you; I would be happy to answer any questions

 

Provide any supporting attachments or documentation

 

Attachment A

 

(Revised Code of Washington http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/) RCW 38.52.010

Definitions.

 

.

(6)(a) "Emergency or disaster" as used in all sections of this chapter except RCW 38.52.430 shall mean an event or set of circumstances which: (i) Demands immediate action to preserve public health, protect life, protect public property, or to provide relief to any stricken community overtaken by such occurrences, or (ii) reaches such a dimension or degree of destructiveness as to warrant the governor declaring a state of emergency pursuant to RCW 43.06.010.

 

 

4. ===== Appearance By Mail Certificate Example =====



 

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

 

 

 

I hereby certify that on February 15, 2007, I served via U.S. Postal Service First Class Mail, with postage fully paid, the following documents:

 

 

 

Cover Letter

Original of "Notice of Appearance
and Memorandum in Support of House Bill 1151"

20 Copies of said Notice

 

 

 

Addressed to:

 

 

State of Washington

House Committee on Agriculture and Natural Resources

Attention: M(r)s. Calista Pearce

P.O. 40600

Olympia, Wash. 98504-0600

 

 

 

 

____________________________

YourNameGoesHere

YourAddressGoesHere

YourCity,YourStateAndZip

 

 

 

5. ===== Appearance By Mail Cover Example =====

 

 

YourNameGoesHere

YourAddressGoesHere,YourCity,YourStateAndZip

Via U.S. Postal Service First Class Mail

 

 

February 15, 2007

 

 

State of Washington

House Committee on Agriculture and Natural Resources

Attention: M(r)s. Calista Pearce

P.O. 40600

Olympia, Wash. 98504-0600

 

 

In re:                 Public Hearing of HB 1151 on February 21, 2006

 

 

Dear M(r)s. Pearce:

 

Please find enclosed the original and 20 copies of my "Notice of Appearance and Memorandum in Support of House Bill 1151". I would appreciate your help in bringing this filing to the attention of the Committee, and add it to the Committee's Record as well.

 

If at all possible, I respectfully request that my statements be read into the Record as well as I am sure that the changes I propose would be in the best interest and to the benefit of many of the state's farmers.

 

Sincerely Yours,

 

 

 

_______________________

YourNameGoesHere

 

Enclosures:      Notice bearing my original signature

                          Certificate of Mailing

                          20 Copies of said Notice

 

 

6. ===== Appearance By Mail Example 2 =====

 

YourNameGoesHere

YourAddressGoesHere,YourCity,YourStateAndZip

Via U.S. Postal Service First Class Mail

 

Notice of Appearance and

Memorandum in Support of House Bill 1151

"Prohibiting the state from establishing or participating in an animal identification system"

 

Public Hearing on Feb. 21, 2007, before the

House Committee on Agriculture and Natural Resources

State of Washington, 60th Legislature, 2007 Regular Session

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS

 

1. LET THE RECORD SHOW that Mr. Bruno Schmidt (hereinafter "Respondent"), hereby respectfully appears before the Committee.

 

2. LET THE RECORD SHOW that Respondent is domiciled in this state, of legal age, without legal disability, appears in his personal capacity, in Good Faith, and has no known conflict of interest with said proposed legislation.

 

3. LET THE RECORD SHOW that Respondent enjoys animal husbandry, farming and related activities. WHEREAS, Respondent has a vested interested in the enactment of this proposed legislation.

 

4. LET THE RECORD SHOW that the state currently performs under one or more contract(s), a.k.a. "Cooperative Agreement(s)", entered into and under the supervision of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, activities that include but are not limited to the implementation of the National Animal Identification System, or certain aspects thereof, in this state.

 

5. LET THE RECORD SHOW that the state, pursuant to said contract(s), has already received certain funding from the U.S. Department of Agriculture that this proposed legislation seeks to discontinue. WHEREAS, the state has a conflict of interest in light of the receipt of said funding or the promise thereof.

 

6. LET THE RECORD SHOW that the state, pursuant to said contract(s), has contracted with and offered compensation to one or more person(s) or organization(s) for the purpose of participating in and/or to carry out some of said activities that this proposed legislation seeks to discontinue. WHEREAS, any such person or organization has a conflict of interest in light of said contracts, or the promise thereof.

 

MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF BILL

 

7. LET THE RECORD SHOW that Respondent holds that the state's establishment of or participation in any program or system purported to identify and/or register and/or track premises, animals, or activities in connection therewith, whether voluntary or mandatory, constitutes a trespass upon Respondent's FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT to property and impairs Respondent's right to contract. WHEREAS, Respondent supports enactment of said proposed legislation

 

8. In re: New Section, Sec. 1: LET THE RECORD SHOW that Respondent agrees with and fully supports the legislature's findings of fact, conclusions of fact, and legislative intent.

 

9. In re: New Section, Sec. 2: LET THE RECORD SHOW that Respondent agrees with and supports the legislature's definitions expressed by clauses (1) through (6). As regards clause (7), Respondent suggests to replace the term "verification" with "validation" throughout the entire bill.
Reasoning: Because the legal definition of "verification" implies "supported by oath or affirmation", Respondent holds that the term "validation" would be a better way to express the bill's legislative intent.

 

10. In re: New Section, Sec. 3: LET THE RECORD SHOW that Respondent fully supports the legislative intent and the specific provisions of clauses (1) through (4).

 

11. In re: New Section, Sec. 4: LET THE RECORD SHOW that Respondent fully supports the legislative intent, namely the state's ability to respond to, control and eradicate a known disease in a specific specie of livestock.

 

12. In re: New Section, Sec. 5: LET THE RECORD SHOW that Respondent fully supports the legislative intent, namely the state's ability to maintain any of the pre-existing livestock identification, brand registration and inspection programs authorized under applicable state law.

 

13. In re: New Section, Sec. 6: LET THE RECORD SHOW that Respondent fully supports the legislative intent and specific provisions of clauses (1) through (4).

 

14. In re: New Section, Sec. 6: LET THE RECORD SHOW that Respondent proposes to add the following provisions:

15. New Clause (5): Any person [domiciled in this state] registered in the National Animal Identification System by the director shall have the right to remain registered with or withdraw from said system consistent with other provisions of this section.
Reasoning: Unless this bill provides for a person's direct interaction with the National Animal Identification System, some persons would be permanently locked into the National Animal Identification System.

16. New Clause (6): Any person [domiciled in this state] wishing to register in the National Animal Identification System shall have the right to do so consistent with other provisions of this section.
Reasoning: Unless this bill provides for a person's direct interaction with the National Animal Identification System, some persons would be permanently shut out of the National Animal Identification System.

 

17. In re: New Section, Sec. 7: LET THE RECORD SHOW that Respondent fully supports the legislative intent and specific provisions of clauses (1) through (4).

 

18. In re: New Section, Sec. 7: LET THE RECORD SHOW that Respondent supports the legislature's intent and provisions expressed by clauses (1) through (3). Respondent proposes to expand clause (4) as follows (emphasis added):

19. Expanded Clause (4): Failure or refusal to participate in a premises registration or animal identification program, or the providing of services to persons who are not participants in a premises registration or animal identification program, shall not be a crime, nor an element of any crime, nor a civil infraction, nor evidence of any negligence or gross negligence on the part of any livestock owner or provider of goods or services.

Reasoning: With this expansion, the director would be prevented from levying civil penalties against non-participating persons.

 

20. In re: New Section, Sec. 7: LET THE RECORD SHOW that Respondent proposes to add the following provisions:

21. New Clause (5): Failure or refusal to participate in a premises registration or animal identification program shall not be construed as, nor shall it be used, as evidence of a person's legal incompetence, or legal disability, or indicate a lack of social responsibility as a citizen of this state.
Reasoning: Under this provision and absent an appropriate court order, the state would be barred from appointing a receiver over said person's affairs, property and/or livestock.

 

REQUEST FOR COMMITTEE ACTION

 

22. Respondent respectfully requests that the Committee reconcile the above suggestions with the bill's original provisions, and promptly forward the reconciled bill to the legislature for enactment into law.

 

DECLARATION

 

Respondent hereby declares that the forgoing is true and correct according to personal knowledge and belief.

 

 

 

 

Dated: February 15, 2007   /s/ YourNameGoesHere, Respondent

 

 

7. ===== Sponsor Information =====

 

 

Sponsor Information for House Bill 1151 (as of January 15, 2007)

 

 

Rep. KIRK PEARSON

(R) 39th LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT

Olympia Office:

416 John L. O'Brien Building

PO Box 40600

Olympia, WA 98504-0600

360-786-7816

[email protected]

 

District Office:

720 Murdock St.

Ste. 101

Sedro-Woolley, WA 98284

360-856-3588

 

====================

 

Rep. JOEL KRETZ

(R) 7th LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT

Olympia Office:

439 John L. O'Brien Building

PO Box 40600

Olympia, WA 98504-0600

360-786-7988

[email protected]

 

District Office:

555 Main St., Suite A

Colville, WA 99114

509-684-7355

 

====================

 

Rep. Hans Dunshee

(D) 44th LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT

Olympia Office:

203 John L. O'Brien Building

PO Box 40600

Olympia, WA 98504-0600

360-786-7804

Toll-free Hotline: 1-800-562-6000

TTY (hearing impaired): 1-800-635-9993

[email protected]

 

===================

 

Rep. Brian Sullivan

(D) 21st LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT

Olympia Office:

122H Legislative Building

PO Box 40600

Olympia, WA 98504-0600

360-786-7972

Toll-free Hotline: 1-800-562-6000

TTY (hearing impaired): 1-800-635-9993

[email protected]

 

====================

 

Rep. DAN KRISTIANSEN

(R) 39th LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT

Olympia Office:

427A Legislative Building

PO Box 40600

Olympia, WA 98504-0600

360-786-7967

[email protected]

 

=====================

 

Rep. JUDY WARNICK

(R) 13th LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT

Olympia Office:

436 John L. O'Brien Building

PO Box 40600

Olympia, WA 98504-0600

360-786-7932

[email protected]

 

District Office:

326 South Cedar St.

Moses Lake, WA 98837

509-766-6505

 

===================

 

Rep. LARRY HALER

(R) 8th LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT

Olympia Office:

421 John L. O'Brien Building

P.O. Box 40600

Olympia, WA 98504-0600

360-786-7986

[email protected]


 

 

Digest

 

 

Rep. Kirk Pearson, (R) 39th District

Olympia Office: 360-786-7816

Sedro-Woolley: 360-856-3588

 

Rep. Joel Kretz, (R) 7th District

Olympia Office: 360-786-7988

Colville Office: 509-684-7355

 

Rep. Hans Dunshee, (D) 44th District

Olympia Office: 360-786-7804

Toll-free Hotline: 1-800-562-6000

TTY (hearing impaired): 1-800-635-9993

[email protected]

 

Rep. Brian Sullivan, (D) 21st District

Olympia Office: 360-786-7972

Toll-free Hotline: 1-800-562-6000

TTY (hearing impaired): 1-800-635-9993

[email protected]

 

Rep. Dan Kristiansen, (R) 39th District

Olympia Office: 360-786-7967

 

Rep. Judy Warnick, (R) 13th District

Olympia Office: 360-786-7932

Moses Lake Office: 509-766-6505

 

Rep. Larry Haler, (R) 8th District

Olympia Office: 360-786-7986