CEQA Process Flowchart: Is the project statutorily exempt?
 

 

(Note: Important definitions included! Why is defining "statutorily exempt" -- or any other word or phrase used in 

property restriction, including "conservation easement" -- important? The phrase "statutorily exempt" is used in these 

six documents: http://www.fws.gov/cookeville/critical_habitat/Arabis_final_report.05.11.04.pdf,

http://www.fws.gov/policy/library/00fr14898.html, http://www.fws.gov/policy/library/00fr14898.html

http://www.fws.gov/cookeville/critical_habitat/brauns_ea3.htm, http://www.fws.gov/policy/library/00fr14898.pdf

http://www.fws.gov/carlsbad/Rules/GnatCatcher_Documents/PDF/CAGN_DEA_Feb2004.pdf Taking the time to 

load/open each of these five documents and doing a search for the phrase "statutorily exempt" -- by using the 

Edit / Find toolbar options -- will give the reader some insight into Language Deception. A few of the acronyms used, 

as well as the several definitions of "conservation easement" and "conservation easements," follows in the additional 

related, researched, recommended reading/information below. "Exemption," "Statute" and "Statutory" are also 

defined, as are "Public-Private Partnerships" and "Public Purpose Debt." Definitions for both "Land" and "Property" 

are included due to the vital importance of understanding the difference between a "land owner" and a 

"property owner" -- and there is a huge difference. "Zoning," "Zoning code, law or ordinance" and "Zoning 

ordinance" -- the latter of which is often replaced by the phrase "Land use code" -- definitions are also included below. 

The importance of understanding the way words and phrases are officially defined cannot be overstated. This 

understanding will help you protect your property rights, custom and culture, and thus, your freedom! Thousands 

of pages of copiously researched definitions may be found here: 

http://www.propertyrightsresearch.org/ebook/index.htm Please consider saving this website address for future use. 

It exists to help you. Hint regarding copying/pasting of long website addresses/URLs: If there is a "dash" -- "-" -- in the

 website address at a line break, it is indicative of only a line break and is not part of the website address/URL and 

should be read like a hyphenated word that would not be hyphenated if not for the line break, i.e., "hy-phenated" 

or "defini-tion." An underscore _ or equal = does not signify a line break, but either or both are part of the website 

address/URL. When seeking to get the full scope of property restriction, try the following phrases: "land acquisition," 

"habitat acquisition," "site acquisition," "conservation easement," "restrictive easement," "minimally restrictive 

easement," and so on. A Google Advanced Search gets these results: Results 1 - 10 of about 364 English pages 

for acquisition land OR habitat OR site OR conservation OR environmental "statutorily exempt" site:.gov  

with Safesearch onhttp://www.google.com/search?as_q=acquisition&num=10&hl=en&btnG=Google+Search&as

_epq=statutorily+exempt&as_oq=land+habitat+site+conservation+environmental&as_eq=&lr=lang_en&as_ft=i&as

_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=.gov&as_rights=&safe=active 

Director's Orders, used by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service -- USFWS -- employ many such words and phrases. Examples: http://policy.fws.gov/do164.html and http://www.fws.gov/policy/do170.html If you find this has been helpful to you, please consider your support of this effort. If you are currently a contributing subscriber to these this effort, please accept my heartfelt thanks. Such support is vital to all our property rights and freedom. If you have not yet begun helping support 

this effort with your contributions, please consider starting today. Those entities bent upon removing all property rights 

are well funded and busy. Should our efforts be starving for support? I do not accept or solicit any grant/foundation funding, which means your taxpayer dollars are not underwriting this effort. All support is voluntary. Email me at propertyrights@earthlink.net for information on donating; you will not only feel good about making a difference -- you will also know your support is helping you, your family and friends as well as your way of life. If you are receiving this via forwarding, please note that you, too, are being helped by the "ripple effect!" Subscribers wishing to unsubscribe for 

any reason, please simply send me a blank email using the email address which receives emails from me, and putting Please Unsubscribe in the Subject Line. It's that easy. New subscribers, please put "Please Subscribe to Property 

Rights Research" in the Subject Line, and your real first and last name, city and state and one email address in the 

body of an email. So I may better tailor emails to your interests, please also provide a "nutshell" description of what 

parts of property rights and resource providing are most important to you. Thank you!)

 

 

May 25, 2006
 

 

WHAT IS A STATUTORY EXEMPTION?

 
 
Statutory exemptions describe types of projects, which the California Legislature has decided are not subject to CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) procedures and policies.
 
 
Statutory exemptions are found in various places in the California Code.
 
 
A comprehensive source of statutory exemptions is found in Article 18 of the CEQA Guidelines. Most of them are listed and summarized in Section 15282 of the Guidelines.
 
 
STATUTORY REFERENCES
 
 
Statutory Exemptions Listed | Public Resources Code §§21080 - 21080.33
 
GUIDELINE REFERENCES
 
 

 

SELECTED CASE LAW

 
 
 
 
 
People v. City of South Lake Tahoe (1978) 466 F.Supp 527
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Copyright 2006, California Resources Agency.
 
 
 
 
 
Additional related, researched, recommended reading/information:  
 
 
 
 
Why is defining "statutorily exempt" important? This phrase is used in these six documents:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
This phrase does not appear to be of any help to resource providers -- those good folks that responsibly utilize our natural resources, almost always in a renewable, exemplary steward way -- or to property owners. That is, unless the property owners are involved in "public-private partnerships" and are "non-governmental organizations" (NGOs), such as, but not limited to, The Nature Conservancy. Want proof?
 
[Excerpt from Pages 14,903-14,904] "The Porter Ranch site, the only site in Monterey County, is privately owned. Taylor (1990) noted that this site is unusual in that the Holocarpha macradenia population is primarily in the bottom of a small canyon, rather than on the adjacent terrace or upper slope. The population is scattered over approximately 1 ha (2.5 ac). Between 1984 and 1993, population sizes fluctuated between 1,500 (1984) and 43,000 plants (1989) (CNDDB 1997). The most recent population estimate in 1993 was 3,200 plants. Cattle grazing at this site continues with varying intensity (M. Silberstein, Elkhorn Slough Foundation, personal communication 1997). Within cattle exclosures, constructed to protect H. macradenia from heavy grazing, the number of plants had decreased to fewer than 100 by 1996 (R. Morgan, personal communication 1997). The owners are interested in developing management plans in conjunction with The Nature Conservancy that would address [[Page 14904]] appropriate grazing levels to benefit H. macradenia (CDFG 1994, M. Silberstein, personal communication 1997). In 1998, CDFG acquired a 16-ha (40-ac) conservation easement on the Porter Ranch that surrounds the H. macradenia population (D. Hillyard, in litt. 1998). The threats to H. macradenia on this site are uncertain." - 2000 Federal Register http://www.fws.gov/policy/library/00fr14898.html
 
CEQA - The California Environmental Quality Act
 
CERES - California Environmental Resources Evaluation System
 
CMLUCA - California Military Land Use Compatibility Analyst http://sample1.casil.ucdavis.edu/Calmap8/index.html 
 
 
LUPIN - Land Use Planning Information Network
 

Conservation easement – Instrument of property ownership in which specified rights to property development are separated from landownership, usually to preclude any substantial change in the current use of the land. A conservation easement allows a landowner to continue to own and use his or her land and to sell it. However, the allowable uses of the land are permanently limited in order to protect its conservation values. – (DOI/NPS) Majority of definitions adapted from “A Park and Recreation Professionals' Glossary,” California Department of Parks and Recreation Planning Division, January 1, 2003; other definitions from California State Law, CEQ (NEPA), and Santa Barbara County. Draft Gaviota Coast Feasibility Study & Environmental Assessment 

http://www.nps.gov/pwro/gaviota/gaviota_draft_report_232-234.pdf 2. A legal document that provides specific land-use rights to a secondary party. A perpetual conservation easement usually grants conservation and management rights to a party in perpetuity. – U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Glossary of Planning Terms http://www.fws.gov/pacific/planning/gloss1.htm 3. A legally binding restriction on allowable uses imposed upon a parcel of land in exchange for a tax break to the landowner. Conservation easements prevent development of a parcel, restricting its used to agriculture, habitat for wildlife, or hiking and other nondestructive forms of recreation. DOI/USFWS http://www.fws.gov/midwest/FoxRiverNEPA/documents/AppendixA.pdf 4. (a) A conservation easement is a legally binding covenant between current and future property owners and an organization such as the conservancy, which preserves significant natural areas (i.e. stream valleys, farmland, woodland, wildlife habitat, unique plant communities) and special natural features of the property by restricting selected uses. A conservation easement allows a property owner to retain ownership of his property, including the ability to pass the property on to his heirs or sell the property, while still providing for the site’s protection. It assures that future use of a property will be consistent with conservation purposes through specific clauses in the easement document. The property remains in private ownership and does not need to be opened to the public. (Pages 1 and 4) (b) A conservation easement is a method of protecting and preserving significant natural areas, (i.e., stream valleys, farmland, woodland, wildlife habitat, unique plant communities, etc.) and special natural features of the property by restricting selected uses. (Page 2) (c) A legally binding agreement between a property owner and an organization such as a conservancy, which protects natural resource values of the property, by restricting selected uses. The property remains in private ownership and does not need to be opened to the public. Tax benefits may apply to the donor. – The Heritage Conservancy http://conserveland.org/lpr/download/6734/landowner_guide.pdf See also Easement.

Conservation Easements – A landowner grants a nonpossessory interest in the property to a third party (usually a nonprofit conservation organization or governmental agency) for the purpose of preventing development of property having important natural, agricultural, scenic, or historic value (i.e., the development value is taken off the land). A conservation easement should “run with the land” and encumber the land in perpetuity. Conservation easements may be sold to produce direct income benefits to the seller. Indeed, many countries in the west are setting-up programs to purchase development rights or conservation easements from willing sellers, primarily to sustain lands in ranching/agricultural production. Conservation easements may be donated to produce income tax deductions and/or tax credits. An important new tax development was recently enacted in the American Farm and Ranch Protection Act, Section 2031 (c), “Estate Tax with Respect to Land Subject to a Qualified Conservation Easement.” This provides the basis to exclude from estate valuation a portion of the land value in addition to the reduction in value already attributable to the easement itself. EPA http://www.epa.gov/efinpage/cwapfin5.pdf (Page 15 of 29) Consideration must be given [regarding Environmental SRFs, or Environmental State Revolving Funds] to the possibility of dealing with complex issues such as land acquisition, conservation easements, and perhaps projects which cross state lines or EPA regional boundaries, to mention a few. http://www.epa.gov/efinpage/cwapfin5.pdf Appendix excerpt (Page 26 of 29) (Important note: It is very important to read the entire document and be forewarned of the Language Deception that is extensively employed throughout) 2. Conservation easements are partial interests in lands conveyed by deed from a landowner to an easement holder with the intent of restricting present and future owners of the property in order to achieve conservation objectives. – Forest Legacy Program Assessment of Needs for the State of Georgia http://www.gfc.state.ga.us/Services/RuralForestry/legacy/AssessmentofNeeds.pdf (Definitions are Pages 103-104 of 110) (Note: only the cached version may be viewed. Trying to directly access this pdf file results in this message: "The Public Website is Here: http://www.gatrees.org")
 
Exemption – A State with primacy may relieve a public water system from a requirement respecting an MCL, treatment technique or both, by granting an exemption if certain conditions exist. These are: 1) the system cannot comply with a MCL or treatment technique due to compelling factors which may include economic factors; 2) the system was in operation on the effective date of the MCL or treatment technique requirement; and 3) the exemption will not result in an unreasonable public health risk. Also see variance. http://www.epa.gov/ogwdw/pubs/gloss2.html 2. A geographic area that is not subject to the prohibitions in the alternatives. – USDA Forest Service Roadless Area Conservation, Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) "Source documents for these definitions include: proposed Road Policy, proposed Planning Regulations, Interim Roads Rule Environmental Assessment, and Recreation Opportunity Spectrum Planning Guide." http://roadless.fs.fed.us/documents/feis/glossary.shtml
 
Land – Real property or any interest therein. http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_01/25cfr151_01.html
 
Property – Something that is owned or possessed. Property may be real (land), personal, tangible (touchable), or intangible (such as the interest in a play or other creative work). – U.S. Treasury OTS (Office of Thrift Supervision, in charge of banks, savings and loan associations, etc.) http://www.ots.treas.gov/glossary/gloss-p.html
 

Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) – The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) defines a “public-private partnership” as “a contractual agreement formed between public and private sector partners, which allows more private sector participation than is traditional. The agreements usually involve a government agency contracting with a private company to renovate, construct, operate, maintain, and/or manage a facility or system. While the public sector usually retains ownership in the facility or system, the private party will be given additional decision rights in determining how the project or task will be completed.” – Partners in Transportation Workshops, Final Report Abstract, June 17, 2005. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ppp/061705wkshp.htm (532 KB) 2. A merging of public and private resources to achieve an end result or product that would be difficult to achieve through public or private activity alone. May refer to the delivery of services, such as childcare or to the construction of buildings, such as cultural facilities. – City of Scottsdale, Arizona, Planning, Building and Zoning Reference Guide Glossary. http://www.scottsdaleaz.gov/generalplan/Glossary.asp 3. Under a public-private partnership, sometimes referred to as a public-private venture, a contractual arrangement is formed between public and private-sector partners. These arrangements typically involve a government agency contracting with a private partner to renovate, construct, operate, maintain, and/or manage a facility or system, in whole or in part, that provides a public service. Under these arrangements, the agency may retain ownership of the public facility or system, but the private party generally invests its own capital to design and develop the properties. Typically, each partner shares in income resulting from the partnership. Such a venture, although a contractual arrangement, differs from typical service contracting in that the private-sector partner usually makes a substantial cash, at-risk, equity investment in the project, and the public sector gains access to new revenue or service delivery capacity without having to pay the private-sector partner. – General Accounting Office (GAO) Public-Private Partnerships Glossary http://www.gao.gov/special.pubs/Gg99071.pdf Types of Public-Private Partnerships Build-Own-Operate (BOO) – Under a BOO transaction, the contractor constructs and operates a facility without transferring ownership to the public sector. Legal title to the facility remains in the private sector, and there is no obligation for the public sector to purchase the facility or take title. A BOO transaction may qualify for tax-exempt status as a service contract if all Internal Revenue Code requirements are satisfied. – General Accounting Office (GAO) Public-Private Partnerships Glossary http://www.gao.gov/special.pubs/Gg99071.pdf Build/Operate/Transfer (BOT) or Build/Transfer/Operate (BTO) - Under the BOT option, the private partner builds a facility to the specifications agreed to by the public agency, operates the facility for a specified time period under a contract or franchise agreement with the agency, and then transfers the facility to the agency at the end of the specified period of time. In most cases, the private partner will also provide some, or all, of the financing for the facility, so the length of the contract or franchise must be sufficient to enable the private partner to realize a reasonable return on its investment through user charges. At the end of the franchise period, the public partner can assume operating responsibility for the facility, contract the operations to the original franchise holder, or award a new contract or franchise to a new private partner. The BTO model is similar to the BOT model except that the transfer to the public owner takes place at the time that construction is completed, rather than at the end of the franchise period. – General Accounting Office (GAO) Public-Private Partnerships Glossary http://www.gao.gov/special.pubs/Gg99071.pdf Buy-Build Operate (BBO) - A BBO transaction is a form of asset sale that includes a rehabilitation or expansion of an existing facility. The government sells the asset to the private sector entity, which then makes the improvements necessary to operate the facility in a profitable manner. – General Accounting Office (GAO) Public-Private Partnerships Glossary http://www.gao.gov/special.pubs/Gg99071.pdf Contract Services Operations and Maintenance – A public partner (federal, state, or local government agency or authority) contracts with a private partner to provide and/or maintain a specific service. Under the private operation and maintenance option, the public partner retains ownership and overall management of the public facility or system. – General Accounting Office (GAO) Public-Private Partnerships Glossary http://www.gao.gov/special.pubs/Gg99071.pdf Operations, Maintenance, and Management - A public partner (federal, state, or local government agency or authority) contracts with a private partner to operate, maintain, and manage a facility or system providing a service. Under this contract option, the public partner retains ownership of the public facility or system, but the private party may invest its own capital in the facility or system. Any private investment is carefully calculated in relation to its contributions to operational efficiencies and savings over the term of the contract. Generally, the longer the contract term, the greater the opportunity for increased private investment because there is more time available in which to recoup any investment and earn a reasonable return. Many local governments use this contractual partnership to provide wastewater treatment services. – General Accounting Office (GAO) Public-Private Partnerships Glossary http://www.gao.gov/special.pubs/Gg99071.pdf Design-Build-Operate (DBO) - In a DBO project, a single contract is awarded for the design, construction, and operation of a capital improvement. Title to the facility remains with the public sector unless the project is a design/build/operate/transfer or design/build/own/operate project. The DBO method of contracting is contrary to the separated and sequential approach ordinarily used in the United States by both the public and private sectors. This method involves one contract for design with an architect or engineer, followed by a different contract with a builder for project construction, followed by the owner’s taking over the project and operating it. A simple design-build approach creates a single point of responsibility for design and construction and can speed project completion by facilitating the overlap of the design and construction phases of the project. On a public project, the operations phase is normally handled by the public sector or awarded to the private sector under a separate operations and maintenance agreement. Combining all three phases into a DBO approach maintains the continuity of private sector involvement and can facilitate private sector financing of public projects supported by user fees generated during the operations phase. – General Accounting Office (GAO) Public-Private Partnerships Glossary http://www.gao.gov/special.pubs/Gg99071.pdf Developer Financing - Under developer financing, the private party (usually a real estate developer) finances the construction or expansion of a public facility in exchange for the right to build residential housing, commercial stores, and/or industrial facilities at the site. The private developer contributes capital and may operate the facility under the oversight of the government. The developer gains the right to use the facility and may receive future income from user fees. While developers may in rare cases build a facility, more typically they are charged a fee or required to purchase capacity in an existing facility. This payment is used to expand or upgrade the facility. Developer financing arrangements are often called capacity credits, impact fees, or exactions. Developer financing may be voluntary or involuntary depending on the specific local circumstances. – General Accounting Office (GAO) Public-Private Partnerships Glossary http://www.gao.gov/special.pubs/Gg99071.pdf Enhanced Use Leasing (EUL) - An EUL is an asset management program in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) that can include a variety of different leasing arrangements (e.g., lease/develop/operate, build/develop/operate). EULs enable the VA to long-term lease VA-controlled property to the private sector or other public entities for non-VA uses in return for receiving fair consideration (monetary or in-kind) that enhances VA’s mission or programs. (See 38 U.S.C. § 8161, et seq.) – General Accounting Office (GAO) Public-Private Partnerships Glossary http://www.gao.gov/special.pubs/Gg99071.pdf Lease/Develop/Operate (LDO) or Build/Develop/Operate (BDO) - Under these partnership arrangements, the private party leases or buys an existing facility from a public agency; invests its own capital to renovate, modernize, and/or expand the facility; and then operates it under a contract with the public agency. A number of different types of municipal transit facilities have been leased and developed under LDO and BDO arrangements. – General Accounting Office (GAO) Public-Private Partnerships Glossary http://www.gao.gov/special.pubs/Gg99071.pdf Lease/Purchase - A lease/purchase is an installment-purchase contract. Under this model, the private sector finances and builds a new facility, which it then leases to a public agency. The public agency makes scheduled lease payments to the private party. The public agency accrues equity in the facility with each payment. At the end of the lease term, the public agency owns the facility or purchases it at the cost of any remaining unpaid balance in the lease. Under this arrangement, the facility may be operated by either the public agency or the private developer during the term of the lease. Lease/purchase arrangements have been used by the General Services Administration for building federal office buildings and by a number of states to build prisons and other correctional facilities. – General Accounting Office (GAO) Public-Private Partnerships Glossary http://www.gao.gov/special.pubs/Gg99071.pdf Sale/Leaseback - A sale/leaseback is a financial arrangement in which the owner of a facility sells it to another entity, and subsequently leases it back from the new owner. Both public and private entities may enter into sale/leaseback arrangements for a variety of reasons. An innovative application of the sale/leaseback technique is the sale of a public facility to a public or private holding company for the purposes of limiting governmental liability under certain ... to operate it. – General Accounting Office (GAO) Public-Private Partnerships Glossary http://www.gao.gov/special.pubs/Gg99071.pdf Tax-Exempt Lease - Under a tax-exempt lease arrangement, a public partner finances capital assets or facilities by borrowing funds from a private investor or financial institution. The private partner generally acquires title to the asset, but then transfers it to the public partner either at the beginning or end of the lease term. The portion of the lease payment used to pay interest on the capital investment is tax exempt under state and federal laws. Tax-exempt leases have been used to finance a wide variety of capital assets, ranging from computers to telecommunication systems and municipal vehicle fleets. - General Accounting Office (GAO) Public-Private Partnerships Glossary http://www.gao.gov/special.pubs/Gg99071.pdf Turnkey - Under a turnkey arrangement, a public agency contracts with a private investor/vendor to design and build a complete facility in accordance with specified performance standards and criteria agreed to between the agency and the vendor. The private developer commits to build the facility for a fixed price and absorbs the construction risk of meeting that price commitment. Generally, in a turnkey transaction, the private partners use fast-track construction techniques (such as design-build) and are not bound by traditional public sector procurement regulations. This combination often enables the private partner to complete the facility in significantly less time and for less cost than could be accomplished under traditional construction techniques. In a turnkey transaction, financing and ownership of the facility can rest with either the public or private partner. For example, the public agency might provide the financing, with the attendant costs and risks. Alternatively, the private party might provide the financing capital, generally in exchange for a long-term contract to operate the facility. - General Accounting Office (GAO) Public-Private Partnerships Glossary http://www.gao.gov/special.pubs/Gg99071.pdf

Public Purpose Debt (related to public-private partnerships) – Public purpose debt is debt used to finance a project intended to be of value to the general public. Such debt can include ordinary government securities, such as general obligation bonds or revenue bonds, as well as qualified private activity bonds. – General Accounting Office (GAO) Public-Private Partnerships Glossary http://www.gao.gov/special.pubs/Gg99071.pdf
 

Statute – A law enacted by a legislature. – U.S. Treasury OTS (Office of Thrift Supervision, in charge of banks, savings and loan associations, etc.) http://www.ots.treas.gov/glossary/gloss-s.html

 

Statutory – Laws passed by Congress or other legislative body. Statutes are laws enacted by the legislative branch of Government and signed by the president. Identifiable by a Public Law (P.L.) number. – Glossary is a feature of Know Net, a knowledge management, e-learning and performance support system sponsored by the Government of the United States of America. Know Net can be accessed at http://www.knownet.hhs.gov http://knownet.hhs.gov/log/propmanDR/PPMGloss/definitions.htm#Property%20Management%20Information%20

System

 
Zoning – The division of a city or county into areas, or zones, which specify allowable uses for real property and size restrictions for buildings and lots within these areas. A zoning ordinance is a law that divides land into zones, specifies uses permitted in each zone, and standards required for each use. Typical zoning classifications include different types of agricultural, residential, industrial and commercial zones. – (DOI/NPS) Majority of definitions adapted from “A Park and Recreation Professionals' Glossary,” California Department of Parks and Recreation Planning Division, January 1, 2003; other definitions from California State Law, CEQ (NEPA), and Santa Barbara County. Draft Gaviota Coast Feasibility Study & Environmental Assessment http://www.nps.gov/pwro/gaviota/gaviota_draft_report_232-234.pdf 2. A legislative process that divides a community into areas (zones) of specified land use and that regulates the location, height, density, type and overall size of buildings within each zone. The zones are designated according to broad categories of land use, such as residential, commercial or industrial, and more specifically as to building type or density of land use, such as single family or multifamily residential. – U.S. Treasury OTS (Office of Thrift Supervision, in charge of banks, savings and loan associations, etc.) http://www.ots.treas.gov/glossary/gloss-n.html 3. Process in physical planning, or the results thereof, in which specific functions or uses are assigned to certain areas (for example, industrial zones, residential areas). (UN) [Zoning is] one of the municipal police powers. A municipal ordinance that defines types and locations of land uses within a community, addressing such elements as lot sizes and setbacks from the street. Purpose is to promote the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the community and protect and preserve places and areas of historical, cultural or architectural importance and significance. Zoning should support the goals of a comprehensive plan. Zoning decisions are based upon a review of the following: appropriate use of land/compatibility with surrounding properties, traffic circulation or congestion, adequate light and air, overcrowding/density, adequate transportation, water, sewer, schools, parks, and other public requirements, conserve value of property. Municipalities adopt zoning ordinances which may in general regulate the following: the height, width, size, and number of stories of buildings and structures; the percentage of a lot or tract that may be occupied; the size of yards (setbacks), courts, and other open spaces; the location and use of buildings, other structures, and land; and population density. The division of a municipality (or other governmental unit) into districts, and the regulation within those districts of 1) the height and bulk of buildings and other structures; 2) the area of a lot that can be built on and the size of required open spaces; 3) the net density of dwelling units; and 4) the use of buildings and land for trade, industry, residence, or other purposes. New York City adopted the first comprehensive zoning in the Country on July 25, 1916, with the New York City Zoning Resolution. 1) Mugler v. Kansas, (123 U.S. 623 Justice Harlan, 1887) - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that when a regulation respecting the use of property is designed 'to prevent serious harm,' no compensation is owing under the takings clause. See Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain by Richard A. Epstein(1) for a discussion of the Mugler and the Euclid v. Ambler decisions. Note particularly the contrast between the Supreme Court's historic attitude about the police power in property (including nuisance) and free speech cases. 2) Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Commission (U.S. Supreme Court 1992) - ... in Penn Central Transportation Co. ... in the course of sustaining New York City's landmarks preservation program against takings challenge, we rejected the petitioner's suggestion that Mugler and the cases following it were premised on, and thus limited by, some objective conception of 'noxiousness.' " " 'Harmful or noxious use' analysis was, in other words, simply the progenitor of our more contemporary statements that 'land-use regulation does not effect a taking if it substantially advances legitimate state interests...' Nollan 484 U.S. at 834 (Quoting Agins v. Tiburon, 447 U.S. at 260); See Penn Central Transportation Co., 438 U.S. at 127; Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365, 387388 (1926)." Judge Scalia goes on to describe this transition and the weakness in distinguishing between "harm-preventing" and "benefit conferring." 3) Euclid v. Ambler (272 U.S. 365 Justice George Sutherland 1926) - This is the oft-cited case where the constitutionality of zoning was ruled on by the Supreme Court. The court upheld the general principle of zoning, which previously was the subject of varying state rulings about its constitutionality. The takings issue was undecided, because the ordinance was broadly challenged on Fourteenth Amendment and due process grounds, not on the effect of any of its specific rules on a particular party. "If these reasons... do not demonstrate the wisdom or sound policy in all respects of those restrictions which we have indicated as pertinent to the inquiry, at least, the reasons are sufficiently cogent to preclude us from saying, as it must be said before the ordinance can be declared unconstitutional, that such provisions are clearly arbitrary and unreasonable, having no substantial relation to the public health, safety, or general welfare." The court noted that because a particular injury was not complained of it would not scrutinize and dissect provisions or matters of administration, "which, if attacked separately, might not withstand the test of constitutionality." 4) Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon (260 U.S. 393, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes 1922) – The Supreme Court ruled that despite the social desirability to prevent buildings from subsiding into mine shafts, the legislation had to provide compensation for the coal company's interest before forbidding them from mining. Yet this ruling is often cited to defend zoning, because the Court stated, "Government hardly could go on if to some extent values incident to property could not be diminished without paying for every such change in the law." 5) Agins v. Tiburon (447 U.S. 255) – In this oft-quoted ruling the U.S. Supreme Court held that a land-use regulation does not effect a taking if it "substantially advance(s) legitimate state interests" and does not "deny an owner economically viable use of his land." In Dolan v. Tigard, the Supreme Court pointed out that the Pennsylvania Coal and Agins rulings did not apply to an exaction such as that under consideration. (1) Harvard University Press, 1985, pp130ff 0,50/85-92 provisions – Refers to the so-called 50/85 and 50/92 provisions for rice and cotton and the 0/85 and 0/92 provisions for wheat and feed grains that were in effect in various forms from 1986 through 1995. Under these provisions farmers could idle all or part of their permitted acreage, putting the idled land in a conserving use, and still receive deficiency payments for part of the acreage. A minimum planting requirement of 50 percent of maximum payment acreage had to be met in order to receive payments in the case of rice and cotton. – USDA-Economic Research Service Farm and Commodity Policy Glossary of Policy Terms. The 1866 Mining Law – R.S. 2477, or Section 8 of the 1866 Mining Act, provides simply: "The right-of-way for the construction of highways over public lands, not reserved for public uses, is hereby granted." http://www.ers.usda.gov/features/farmbill/2002glossary.htm 4. A process in which a marine protected area is divided into discrete zones and particular human uses of each zone are permitted, often with conditions such as gear limitations in fishing and waste discharge prohibitions in tourism. In the U.S., marine sanctuaries, national parks, national wildlife refuges, and state MPAs are some examples of areas that may be zoned. – NOAA's Coral Reef Data Discovery Glossary http://www8.nos.noaa.gov/coris_glossary/index.aspx?letter=z
 
Zoning code, law or ordinance – A local law prescribing how and for what purpose each parcel of land in a community may be used. – U.S. Treasury OTS (Office of Thrift Supervision, in charge of banks, savings and loan associations, etc.) http://www.ots.treas.gov/glossary/gloss-n.html
 
Zoning ordinance (ZO) – A zoning ordinance is a law that divides land into zones, specifies uses permitted in each zone, and standards required for each use. Typical zoning classifications include different types of agricultural, residential, industrial and commercial zones. – (DOI/NPS) Majority of definitions adapted from “A Park and Recreation Professionals' Glossary,” California Department of Parks and Recreation Planning Division, January 1, 2003; other definitions from California State Law, CEQ (NEPA), and Santa Barbara County. Draft Gaviota Coast Feasibility Study & Environmental Assessment http://www.nps.gov/pwro/gaviota/gaviota_draft_report_232-234.pdf See also Land use code
 
 
Services

California Military Land Use Compatibility Analyst (CMLUCA)
Data Type
Topic
   
 
 
 
Organization
  
2005 California Watershed Forum: Building a Statewide Watershed Program

Resources Agency Data Cataloging and Sharing Policy

CalFish releases new version of California’s premiere website on anadromous and freshwater fish

California Bay-Delta Authority Science Program call for $18-$20 Million in proposals for projects