| Loose dogs not at fault;
irresponsible owners are
August 25, 2006
By Julie Kay Smithson propertyrights@earthlink.net
First things first. He will not need stitches. By the grace of God, he's going to be all right. I'm the one that's feeling 'fried' tonight. He's consoling me, sweet fellow that he is! I have a lump in my throat that just won't go away.
Wiggles was attacked tonight while we were out walking
on leash. A large part-St. Bernard put a dozen puncture
wounds in the left side of his face (just missed getting his
left eye) and inside his mouth toward the back is an inch-long cut and
bruised place.
I am sick and tired of thoughtless bullies letting
their dogs run loose, and hurting my sweet, guileless, blind dog!
Wiggles is sweet as ever, though kind of 'spotted'
looking, due to the punctures.
The county sheriff came and took a report, the
park maintenance guy came out and commiserated with us and the park
manager just left.
We've a veterinary appointment, and it looks like
another trip to court. At least we've got a good, caring dog
warden now!
Police issue pepper spray doesn't work; I gave an attacking boxer a
faceful of it, but it wasn't even fazed.
A walking stick was carried, but trying to hit the offending dog when
it attacks 'out of nowhere' is difficult when your own dog is right
there, too.
The latest suggestion is an electric cattle prod, but again, touching
the bad dog and missing the good dog is difficult when there are two
dogs in whirling motion 'round one's feet.
Sigh ... I try my best to do the best for him, but
guess that cannot include walks in the park.
Seven attacks by six dogs (all but one here in the
park) in less than eight years, and each time, the attacking dog was
loose and Wiggles was sedately walking at my side, on leash.
The offending breeds? A black Chow -- twice. A black
Lab. A boxer. A German Shepherd. A pit bull. A St. Bernard.
What do all these offenders have in common, besides
being larger than my medium-sized cattle dog?
Their "owners" think it's fine to let them
run loose.
The dogs themselves are opportunists and will go after
a well-mannered, quiet, non-aggressive pet that's walking on a leash
with its owner.
Such malicious acts are perpetrated upon a blind dog.
This is the epitome of the word bully, and fits both owners and dogs.
What does this have to do with property rights? Our peace of mind and
health are our property, and we have the right to walk, unmolested, in
the park. We have the right to get outdoor exercise. Those
seeking "rights" for their various dog breeds to roam at
will, actually want the "right" for attacks to occur, their
dogs to be hit and maimed or killed by cars or possibly maimed or
killed by other loose dogs or wildlife/predators.
How much can someone "love" their dog by letting it run
loose?
How much of a "dog lover" can such a person be, knowing
that the very real possibility exists that such needless altercations
will happen?
|