Ohio Senate approves bill to ban eminent domain 
 
 
(Note: Call me cynical, but this Band-Aid approach conveniently stops eminent domain until ... can you guess? ... AFTER the next political election! After they are voted back into office and firmly ensconced, off goes the moratorium and the specter of eminent domain is again invited to raise its greedy, reminiscent-of-Medusa heads.)
 
 
October 6, 2005
 

By Andrew Welsh-Huggins
 
Associated Press 
 
Published, among others, by the Cleveland Plain Dealer (Ohio)
 
To submit a Letter to the Editor: letters@plaind.com
 
 
Columbus, Ohio - The Senate unanimously approved a bill Wednesday designed to prohibit state and local governments from taking property for use by private developers until 2007. 
 
The legislation, approved 29-0, follows last summer's 5-4 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court that said such eminent domain seizures were constitutionally protected but also noted that states could enact their own, tougher laws. 
 
Lawmakers' approval of the measure comes as the Ohio Supreme Court considers a similar issue involving a suburban Cincinnati city's takeover of a neighborhood it said was deteriorating. 
 
The measure is a reasonable response to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision because it creates a committee to study the issues presented by the court's ruling, said bill sponsor Sen. Tim Grendell. 
 
"We have to find ways to promote economic development that doesn't sacrifice private property rights that have been the mainstay of this country since its inception," he said Wednesday.
 
Texas passed a law in August banning such seizures and several states are considering similar bans. 
 
Grendell, a Republican from Northeast Ohio known for his attempts to limit government, said those bills are knee-jerk reactions that could create unintended consequences later. 
 
A lawyer representing the developer trying to build shops and offices in Norwood in suburban Cincinnati said eminent domain can be an important tool for cities faced with declining revenue. 
 
The Ohio bill "is the first time economic development has been denigrated," said attorney Richard Tranter. 
 
The bill goes now to the House, where Speaker Jon Husted says the chamber will approve some sort of eminent domain legislation by year's end. 
 
A related resolution in the Senate proposed by Sen. Kevin Coughlin calls for amending the state constitution to eliminate the option of eminent domain. 
 
Businesses and local governments have testified in support of the moratorium, while voicing some concerns about limiting the use of property seizure for economic development, especially in cities where options for expansion are limited. 
 
"Commercial industry is the bread and butter of a community in Ohio," Kimberly Gibson, a representative of a coalition of older Ohio suburbs, told the Senate Local Government Committee on Tuesday. "Without it, communities stagnate, wealth moves out and social problems accelerate."
 
 
 
Copyright 2005, The Plain Dealer.
 
 
 
Related reading:
 
 
Ohio Senate approves bill to ban eminent domain
Cleveland Plain Dealer - 11 hours ago
-- The Senate unanimously approved a bill Wednesday designed to prohibit state and local governments from taking property for use by private developers until 2007. The legislation, approved 29-0, follows last ...
Public hearing on eminent domain WTNH
Bill tackles eminent domain issue Dayton Daily News (subscription)
Channel Cincinnati.com - Akron Beacon Journal - Dayton Business Journal - all 37 related »