A good (non) development
 
(Note: The city fathers and these editors keep rhapsodizing about greenways and open space ... as though the populace can live on both. All the warm and fuzzy buzzwords and phrases are in place in this fairy tale.)
 
February 12, 2004
 
The Editorial Board of The Hamden Journal
 
Published by Hometown Publications

1000 Bridgeport Avenue

Shelton, Connecticut 06484
203-926-2080
 
Fax: 203-926-2091
To submit a Letter to the Editor: hamdenjournal@add-inc.com
 
The Legislative Council last week approved a $2.9 million bond package to acquire 183 acres of land near Brooksvale Park. The Regional Water Authority (RWA) and state Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) will contribute funds toward the purchase, leaving the town with a net $1.67 million tab. The town will bond the total over 20 years.
Historically, the Hamden Journal has favored such deals, for a number of reasons. These include economics, education and quality of life. In a community like Hamden, which is among the most developed in the state, preservation of undeveloped land makes even more sense.

This parcel has been a target of developers for years. In 2002, owner Joseph Kelly proposed construction of 86 single-family homes in subdivisions called Brooksvale Estates North and Brooksvale Estates South. Last year, the Inland Wetlands Commission denied Kelly's application.

Following the denial, Kelly sued the town, appealing the commission's decision. The town and Kelly will settle the suit as part of the sale.

Starting in September of 2003, Assistant Town Attorney Timothy Lee and Mayor Carl Amento began negotiating for the town to acquire the property and maintain it as open space.

Throughout the process, the town held the option to take the property by eminent domain, with the courts determining fair market value. Such an action likely would have resulted in a greater cost to the town, because the DEP only approves grants for voluntary sales of property. Also, the town would have incurred significant additional legal costs for the eminent domain proceedings.

According to town estimates, development of the property would have resulted in substantial additional expense to the town. Such expenses include education for children who move into the neighborhood; police and fire protection; trash and recycling pickup; leaf pickup and street cleaning; snow removal, etc. Amento estimates the additional costs would far exceed the yearly debt payments the town will incur as a result of this purchase.

True, the new residents who moved into the sub-developments would have paid property taxes on their new homes. However, the added costs of services would have more than offset any additions to the Grand List. For example, the average new house in Hamden brings in $7,900 per year in property tax, assuming the new homes would have had a selling price around $300,000. The average cost of educating one child in town is $10,600. Statistics show that new, multi-bedroom houses usually attract families with at least one or two children. Therefore, while each of those 86 new homes that Kelly proposed would have generated tax revenue, they also would have cost the town about $2,700 each just for schooling.

Of course families with children won't move into every home, some families will send their children to private schools and many will remain in their homes after their children graduate. Still, even this rough estimate shows how quickly costs can mount.

From our perspective, the biggest incentive to the town was the chance to secure nearly 200 acres of open space and add the land to Brooksvale Park. Hamden residents have few recreational areas. The new parkland, added to other recreational areas like the Farmington Canal Greenway and the proposed Town Center Park, will do much to increase the quality of life in town.
 
Copyright 2004 The Hamden Journal